Chat Derek Chauvin Guilty! Fuck yes!

[Jumpin’ Jack Flash]

At least @Michael777 seems good natured. Although I become more and more convinced he is an AI bot.

I don’t think so. AI bots are much smarter

 

[qinging]

I see what you did there! but not before he recognized himself and took the bait.

oooo..do you want to be called sly barite

 

[sy barite]

The Daily Wire on Instagram: "@officialbenshapiro reacts to the guilty charges of Derek Chauvin"

22K likes, 543 comments - realdailywire on April 20, 2021: "@officialbenshapiro reacts to the guilty charges of Derek Chauvin".

www.instagram.com

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

To someone as completely unversed in law as I am, these still seem like excellent points to me. But in today's world, they will give no one who believes in Chauvin's guilt reason to reassess. That's just not the way our world works anymore.

 

[jimmyd]

To someone as completely unversed in law as I am, these still seem like excellent points to me. But in today's world, they will give no one who believes in Chauvin's guilt reason to reassess. That's just not the way our world works anymore.

It’s seems like everything is like the blue or gold dress. We either see blue or gold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[qinging]

It’s seems like everything is like the blue or gold dress. We either see blue or gold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OMG...your boy said believe your eyes...

 

[sy barite]

It’s seems like everything is like the blue or gold dress. We either see blue or gold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I honestly make an effort to listen to both sides. I go out of my way to expose myself to multiple views on the issues, but I notice something that I find very telling. Generally speaking, when you disagree with someone on the right, you get an argument. When you disagree with someone on the left, you are immediately accused and labelled the very worst things. It's almost impossible to have a good faith discussion.

 

[Pay2Play]

The title says it all. Hopefully America has turned a corner. We have to wait another six weeks for sentencing. For me as well as everyone else I hope this is the inflexion point, that things start getting better from here.

We all get the news. So you need to celebrate this here? Why is that?

 

[UsefulIdiot]

We all get the news. So you need to celebrate this here? Why is that?

The spas are closed.

 

[Pay2Play]

The spas are closed.

No. Spas are not closed.

 

[qinging]

I honestly make an effort to listen to both sides. I go out of my way to expose myself to multiple views on the issues, but I notice something that I find very telling. Generally speaking, when you disagree with someone on the right, you get an argument. When you disagree with someone on the left, you are immediately accused and labelled the very worst things. It's almost impossible to have a good faith discussion.

Unfortunately you don't sell this vaunted view of yourself very well. You come across as a bigot.

 

[Pay2Play]

The spas are closed.

Reading through the responses I’ll ask again...why?

 

[jimmyd]

I honestly make an effort to listen to both sides. I go out of my way to expose myself to multiple views on the issues, but I notice something that I find very telling. Generally speaking, when you disagree with someone on the right, you get an argument. When you disagree with someone on the left, you are immediately accused and labelled the very worst things. It's almost impossible to have a good faith discussion.

I’m the same way. I try to be as objective as possible.

With this case for instance, at first I thought Chauvin should have the book thrown at him. But as the facts came out, and learning that the attorney general withheld the complete bodycam footage at first, I realized there’s a lot more to the story.

The left is another type of person. There is no discussion. Only attributing motives, labelling, and name calling.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

Unfortunately you don't sell this vaunted view of yourself very well. You come across as a bigot.

You’re making his point. Good job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[qinging]

.....and silly sy barite thinks Maxine Waters tainted the jury pool...Hahaha

 

[jimmyd]

.....and silly sy barite thinks Maxine Waters tainted the jury pool...Hahaha

The judge said she may have caused a mistrial. So there’s that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[qinging]

The judge said she may have caused a mistrial. So there’s that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

....not to mention your boy....your boy disagrees with you....your boy...."we saw what we saw"

 

[Hornet]

The judge said she may have caused a mistrial. So there’s that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You are a complete fucking moron blinded by your own right-wing conspiracy outlets you won’t actually watch with your own eyes and listen with your own ears. Here is his statement where he denies the Defence’s motion for a mistrial. If he thought there was a mistrial, he would have declared it right then and there. So there’s that.

 

[jimmyd]

You are a complete fucking moron blinded by your own right-wing conspiracy outlets you won’t actually watch with your own eyes and listen with your own ears. Here is his statement where he denies the Defence’s motion for a mistrial. If he thought there was a mistrial, he would have declared it right then and there. So there’s that.

Take down the anger bro. The judge said “I’d use that in an appeal”.

What right-wing conspiracy outlets are you referring to? Ben Shapiro, a lawyer?

Sy was right. You guys can’t have a civil discussion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

Gotta love that liberal media!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hornet]

Take down the anger bro. The judge said “I’d use that in an appeal”.

What right-wing conspiracy outlets are you referring to? Ben Shapiro, a lawyer?

Sy was right. You guys can’t have a civil discussion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Appeal is very different than a mistrial. You claimed the judge said she may have caused a mistrial. Well, the defence claimed that, made a motion to the judge to declare a mistrial, the judge considered it and denied it. If he thought there was grounds for a mistrial he would have declared it right then and there. He didn’t. You consistently misrepresent what actually happens and claim you are fair and unbiased which you are not.

Ben Shapiro is a very talented debater and I wouldn’t want to go head to head with him. I agree with him that the 3rd degree murder charge was silly. 3rd degree murder is like shooting a gun into a crowd, you didn’t mean to kill a specific person but you did intent harm or death randomly and it just so happened to be that victim. As for the 2nd degree, he’s claiming it’s his training. Many officers and Use of Force trainers said it wasn’t. That’s the key point, 2nd degree murder requires a felony. That felony is assault. To prove that, the prosecution had to prove that what Chauvin did (knee on the neck for over 9 minutes while he was handcuffed and then passed out and all bystanders yelling at the cops to check his pulse and get off of him) was not part of his training. That is the key difference in perception of the outcome. But even Ben admitted the manslaughter charge was a much stronger case for the prosecution.