https://www.thestar.com/entertainme...fears_arrest_owes_500000_in_childsupport.html
The judge who imposed the original alimony payment requirements on Dave Foley agreed with his ex-wife that it costs $12,000 per month to raise a child in Toronto. And when Dave's income dropped in later years, the judge refused to allow him to adjust the alimony payments downward. Apparently, once a higher amount of support is assigned to you as the father, you better not make less money going forward. Of course, if Dave had made more money, the judge would have granted his ex-wife more money in future years, but not the other way around.
$12,000 per month to raise a child? WTF? You could raise 10 kids for less than $12,000 per month. Sorry, that's 2 kids he has with that cunt. Even at $6,000 each, those are some well cared for children. Of course, the ex-wife can shack up with another man, fuck that guy in her ex-husband's previous bedroom, and claim hardship all along.
His ex wife is not required to work, but Dave is required to work and support both his kids. His wife has custody, as women always get custody in these situations.
How does each child cost $6,000 per month? Even private school and possible car payments for each kid - if they are given cars of their own to drive to school with - wouldn't cost $6,000 each per month.
When women divorce and demand alimony, they are telling the world that they want the same lifestyle their husband afforded them when they were married, but they don't want the husband to have the same lifestyle he was afforded while they were married. The ex wives want the same lifestyle just without the man in their lives. And almost every cunt supports this type of judgement and even some Mangina males who hate themselves, such as Lost Innocence and Playfulfun support this shit.
Male privelage, obviously.