I actually disagree with you that keeping girls busy with clients is the least of their problems, for the top girls such as Olivia, Avah, Helena, Michelle this is not a problem for some of the newer girls this is a problem. If you look at this Mondayโs night shift there is only 4 girls working the full night shift. Similarly the Wednesday and Thursday night shift only have 5 girls working full time. Also if you look at a lot of the new hires they turnover quickly. Premier doesnโt have to do this but I believe they need to do something to show prospective girls that they will get clients and earn decent money. I will use Sasha as an example prior to COVID Tiana would not have tolerated a girl working at both Premier and an escort agency at the same time so openly because it takes business away from Premier which is somewhat the case with Sasha as she doesnโt care where the client sees her whether at Premier or SFT. In fact when I saw her at Premier she recommend I see her at SFT because it has a bed.
The other SPAs have different problems. Flirts problem is they are against extras which I think is a mistake as extras are now the Industry norm. Seductions problem is the culture at the SPA and the amount of hard drugs there. If Seductions cracked down on the drugs and returned to the Seductions of 2019 it would be the number 1 spa in my opinion now. Note to recruit girls Seductions does offer hiring bonuses though they did stiff a couple girls on the bonus recently. Both Seductions and Flirt have a customer loyalty program while Premier doesnโt.
Personally, of the many reasons why girls might not stick with Premier I don't think lack of clients is very high on the list...
If they only have four girls on a shift then yes clearly they don't have enough staff, but that in and of itself absolutely does not signify their girls aren't busy enough! If anything, when there are less girls on shift chances are whoever is there will be busier.
Likewise staff turnover of new girls does not necessarily mean they are leaving because they don't have enough clients. Girls leave for all kinds of reasons. For example you had mentioned you think management should be more up front with new hires about extras. But not wanting to do extras could be one of countless reasons why new girls ultimately decide not to commit.
Or get fired! Do we even know if the turnover is from girls leaving the spa or from the spa letting them go? Many guys simply assume when girls migrate from one spa to another they've all quit - this is often not the case! Historically Premier has been known to be very selective about their staff.
Staffing shortages are not unique to Premier - they are industry wide, and of course other industries are also having very same issues. Because it's hard to get staff right now that may well absolutely be why management would be willing to tolerate girls who are also simultaneously working for agencies. But I thought we wanted them to retain staff?! Is that sort of relaxation of their normal standards and expectations a good thing or a bad thing?
Like many, chances are you've noticed it's less likely someone at Premier is going to demand $400 for FS from you. If girls were encouraged to charge whatever they wished, that would probably be a way more effective policy in motivating girls to work at Premier. On the other hand, if they are discouraged or forbidden from charging crazy extra fees, in my opinion that would make them way more likely to leave than the issue of not having enough clients. So which way to go?
In sum, like many places there could be all kinds of reasons why it's a really hard time to secure and maintain staff right now, but personally I don't think low client demand is really the primary issue at Premier, and it's hard to see how guaranteeing a minimum wage to the worst performers is economically viable or desirable from a quality control standpoint, even in a very challenging hiring environment.
Other suggestions you've made like social media, client loyalty program, etc. those could all absolutely make a big difference. It's the basic income guarantee I'm questioning, since it doesn't seem to make a lot of economic sense and furthermore it doesn't sound like any other spas are doing this.
Likewise signing bonuses. For a very short while Seduction was promoting signing bonuses, but besides that I haven't seen much about singing bonuses being offered at any spa. Is Seduction still doing signing bonuses? Perhaps there are also some other spas doing the same I don't know about?
Same problem with signing bonuses: so many women coming and going all the time and so many of them will be terrible - how do you make a program like that workable and economically viable?