Peter McKay - Bill C36

[Whitesnake1987]

So the man who brought us Bill C-36 want to run for PM of Canada.

 

[altaguetta]

So the man who brought us Bill C-36 want to run for PM of Canada.

Justice minister insists Bill C-36 will protect sex workers

www.macleans.ca

"Peter MacKay tells Senate committee that the controversial prostitution bill will eventually abolish it"

When pigs fly...

He's just another liberal.

 

[Pay2Play]

Justice minister insists Bill C-36 will protect sex workers

www.macleans.ca

"Peter MacKay tells Senate committee that the controversial prostitution bill will eventually abolish it"

When pigs fly...

He's just another liberal.

Liberal?

 

[altaguetta]

Liberal?

Yes. Who's not liberal?

 

[Foreigner]

If anyone bases their vote on such a trivial issue, instead of issues that really affect quality of life for all of our society, they probably shouldn’t vote.

 

[Ursus]

Peter McKay is a POS, but he is a lesser POS than the typical and potential NDP or Liberal candidate.

You can tell how terrible or great a person is by the level of control they want to exert over others. Left wing candidates want everything controlled by govt - where you send your child to school, what you eat, what you drive, how you spend your money etc. Right wing candidates generally want to keep the 'immoral' activity controlled while giving you more freedom with your economic activity. Of course, these days, the entire spectrum of political activity from all parties has moved to the left, so even conservatives are basically Liberals from 30 years ago.

Would you rather be set on fire or freeze to death?

I would rather freeze to death, as it is the better option. But, obviously, both options are terrible. No matter who you vote for, they will steal, control and rape you and your wallet in the end. You just have to choose how much of that stealing, controlling and raping behaviour you can tolerate.

Our country would be much better off if we would cancel the right of women to vote in political elections. As more women vote in Canada, the country goes further into the whole. Women have no place in society other to have children. Anything else they do is destructive.

It takes both a man and a woman in order to produce children, so that cant be an argument in support of womens' contributions to our society as a whole. When you take out child birth, what else do women contribute?

Men build houses, we build roads, we maintain the power that is used, the transportation system, the tech and everything else.

What do women contribute

Answer: Nothing.

So why do we give them equal voting rights in our country?

 

[Pay2Play]

Fuck, for I guy that’s so well written your a dummy!

Peter McKay is a POS, but he is a lesser POS than the typical and potential NDP or Liberal candidate.

You can tell how terrible or great a person is by the level of control they want to exert over others. Left wing candidates want everything controlled by govt - where you send your child to school, what you eat, what you drive, how you spend your money etc. Right wing candidates generally want to keep the 'immoral' activity controlled while giving you more freedom with your economic activity. Of course, these days, the entire spectrum of political activity from all parties has moved to the left, so even conservatives are basically Liberals from 30 years ago.

Would you rather be set on fire or freeze to death?

I would rather freeze to death, as it is the better option. But, obviously, both options are terrible. No matter who you vote for, they will steal, control and rape you and your wallet in the end. You just have to choose how much of that stealing, controlling and raping behaviour you can tolerate.

Our country would be much better off if we would cancel the right of women to vote in political elections. As more women vote in Canada, the country goes further into the whole. Women have no place in society other to have children. Anything else they do is destructive.

It takes both a man and a woman in order to produce children, so that cant be an argument in support of womens' contributions to our society as a whole. When you take out child birth, what else do women contribute?

Men build houses, we build roads, we maintain the power that is used, the transportation system, the tech and everything else.

What do women contribute

Answer: Nothing.

So why do we give them equal voting rights in our country?

 

[altaguetta]

If anyone bases their vote on such a trivial issue, instead of issues that really affect quality of life for all of our society, they probably shouldn’t vote.

So you're saying the same as Ursus.

Women voted for Trudeau because he was a pretty boy.

So women shouldn't vote at the elections.

In the US women voted for Obama because he was "black" and for Hillary because she was a woman.

So women shouldn't vote at the elections.

Got it.

 

[Foreigner]

So you're saying the same as Ursus.

Women voted for Trudeau because he was a pretty boy.

So women shouldn't vote at the elections.

In the US women voted for Obama because he was "black" and for Hillary because she was a woman.

So women shouldn't vote at the elections.

Got it.

Nope, nothing at all like his post. I am simply saying that this issue does not trump economic issues or education or health care.

 

[rhuarc]

So you're saying the same as Ursus.

Women voted for Trudeau because he was a pretty boy.

So women shouldn't vote at the elections.

In the US women voted for Obama because he was "black" and for Hillary because she was a woman.

So women shouldn't vote at the elections.

Got it.

I mean, idiots in general shouldn't vote, and those are idiotic reasons to vote for someone. Hell, my aunt voted for Trudeau this last time around because "Scheer looks creepy".
Voting for someone because they're attractive, or because of their gender or skin color, is fucked up.

But I think the point Peter was making is that there are bigger fish to fry than the guy's perspective on prostitution, like his perspective on economic issues. And I agree with that.

 

[altaguetta]

I mean, idiots in general shouldn't vote, and those are idiotic reasons to vote for someone. Hell, my aunt voted for Trudeau this last time around because "Scheer looks creepy".
Voting for someone because they're attractive, or because of their gender or skin color, is fucked up.

But I think the point Peter was making is that there are bigger fish to fry than the guy's perspective on prostitution, like his perspective on economic issues. And I agree with that.

Bigger fish to fry?

BIGGER FISH TO FRY?

Dear dumb, brainless dudes!

You can get arrested for communication for getting services of a prostitute.

You can go to jail for 6 months for having sex with a prostitute for money or gifts!!!

I guess, the economy is more important!?!?!


You're being treated as a slave by your government, they put you in jail for having sex with another consenting adult but apparently you have bigger fish to fry!!!


There are many European countries where prostitution is legal but in fucking Canada dudes don't care if the government jails them for performing a natural human act!

 

[ToucanDan]

Peter McKay is a POS, but he is a lesser POS than the typical and potential NDP or Liberal candidate.

You can tell how terrible or great a person is by the level of control they want to exert over others. Left wing candidates want everything controlled by govt - where you send your child to school, what you eat, what you drive, how you spend your money etc. Right wing candidates generally want to keep the 'immoral' activity controlled while giving you more freedom with your economic activity. Of course, these days, the entire spectrum of political activity from all parties has moved to the left, so even conservatives are basically Liberals from 30 years ago.

Would you rather be set on fire or freeze to death?

I would rather freeze to death, as it is the better option. But, obviously, both options are terrible. No matter who you vote for, they will steal, control and rape you and your wallet in the end. You just have to choose how much of that stealing, controlling and raping behaviour you can tolerate.

Our country would be much better off if we would cancel the right of women to vote in political elections. As more women vote in Canada, the country goes further into the whole. Women have no place in society other to have children. Anything else they do is destructive.

It takes both a man and a woman in order to produce children, so that cant be an argument in support of womens' contributions to our society as a whole. When you take out child birth, what else do women contribute?

Men build houses, we build roads, we maintain the power that is used, the transportation system, the tech and everything else.

What do women contribute

Answer: Nothing.

So why do we give them equal voting rights in our country?

I'm actually impressed as to how cohesive and articulate you are given the bullshit you wrote. Outstanding

 

[Whitesnake1987]

Peter McKay is a POS, but he is a lesser POS than the typical and potential NDP or Liberal candidate.

You can tell how terrible or great a person is by the level of control they want to exert over others. Left wing candidates want everything controlled by govt - where you send your child to school, what you eat, what you drive, how you spend your money etc. Right wing candidates generally want to keep the 'immoral' activity controlled while giving you more freedom with your economic activity. Of course, these days, the entire spectrum of political activity from all parties has moved to the left, so even conservatives are basically Liberals from 30 years ago.

Would you rather be set on fire or freeze to death?

I would rather freeze to death, as it is the better option. But, obviously, both options are terrible. No matter who you vote for, they will steal, control and rape you and your wallet in the end. You just have to choose how much of that stealing, controlling and raping behaviour you can tolerate.

Our country would be much better off if we would cancel the right of women to vote in political elections. As more women vote in Canada, the country goes further into the whole. Women have no place in society other to have children. Anything else they do is destructive.

It takes both a man and a woman in order to produce children, so that cant be an argument in support of womens' contributions to our society as a whole. When you take out child birth, what else do women contribute?

Men build houses, we build roads, we maintain the power that is used, the transportation system, the tech and everything else.

What do women contribute

Answer: Nothing.

So why do we give them equal voting rights in our country?

Women contribute...THE PUSSY!

 

[rhuarc]

Bigger fish to fry?

BIGGER FISH TO FRY?

Dear dumb, brainless dudes!

You can get arrested for communication for getting services of a prostitute.

You can go to jail for 6 months for having sex with a prostitute for money or gifts!!!

I guess, the economy is more important!?!?!


You're being treated as a slave by your government, they put you in jail for having sex with another consenting adult but apparently you have bigger fish to fry!!!


There are many European countries where prostitution is legal but in fucking Canada dudes don't care if the government jails them for performing a natural human act!

If McKay wins and he cracks down on the industry, I'll choose whether or not I still want to accept the risk involved.
If some NDP dink wins and tanks the economy, I don't get a choice, unless that choice is to leave the country.

But like I said in another thread, I'm absolutely pissed this guy is running and likely will win the candidacy. I want a fiscal conservative with a libertarian attitude on social issues. Not a fucking moral crusader.

 

[69isbest]

So the man who brought us Bill C-36 want to run for PM of Canada.

So it is obvious from the comments on this thread, there should be an IQ test in order to vote in an election. A bill is not dreamed up by one MP or MPP, it is done through a series of committees and then scrutinized by a team of lawyers with Supreme Court expertise. Then the bill is sent to another committee to be debated. Then it goes to the House of Commons for 3 readings and debate. It then goes to the Senate for another debate. Any and all changes to the bill, again has to go back to The House of Commons. It then goes to The Governor General for Royal assent. So that is how a bill is passed and turned into the law of the land. This debate about Peter McKay is both pointless and asinine. Join a political party and vote for the next leader of said party or just shut the fuck up and learn what actually happens in this country!! Or better yet go back to where you came from-your mother's fucking basement you fucking asshole troll!!

 

[Ursus]

So it is obvious from the comments on this thread, there should be an IQ test in order to vote in an election. A bill is not dreamed up by one MP or MPP, it is done through a series of committees and then scrutinized by a team of lawyers with Supreme Court expertise. Then the bill is sent to another committee to be debated. Then it goes to the House of Commons for 3 readings and debate. It then goes to the Senate for another debate. Any and all changes to the bill, again has to go back to The House of Commons. It then goes to The Governor General for Royal assent. So that is how a bill is passed and turned into the law of the land. This debate about Peter McKay is both pointless and asinine. Join a political party and vote for the next leader of said party or just shut the fuck up and learn what actually happens in this country!! Or better yet go back to where you came from-your mother's fucking basement you fucking asshole troll!!

Committees?

So you are telling me that the new Gender Identity laws recently passed within Canada were generated in Committee by experienced politicians that identified a need for such laws?

Are you smoking crack? Or are you beyond stupid?

 

[69isbest]

Committees?

So you are telling me that the new Gender Identity laws recently passed within Canada were generated in Committee by experienced politicians that identified a need for such laws?

Are you smoking crack? Or are you beyond stupid?

Unfortunately every time you open your mouth Ursus you remove all doubt that you are a fool. It is really a shame that either you or whitesnake are allowed to walk free amongst us without supervision....

 

[Whitesnake1987]

So it is obvious from the comments on this thread, there should be an IQ test in order to vote in an election. A bill is not dreamed up by one MP or MPP, it is done through a series of committees and then scrutinized by a team of lawyers with Supreme Court expertise. Then the bill is sent to another committee to be debated. Then it goes to the House of Commons for 3 readings and debate. It then goes to the Senate for another debate. Any and all changes to the bill, again has to go back to The House of Commons. It then goes to The Governor General for Royal assent. So that is how a bill is passed and turned into the law of the land. This debate about Peter McKay is both pointless and asinine. Join a political party and vote for the next leader of said party or just shut the fuck up and learn what actually happens in this country!! Or better yet go back to where you came from-your mother's fucking basement you fucking asshole troll!!

Bravo, you buyer of sex.

You've got a real hard on for PM.

 

[69isbest]

Bravo, you buyer of sex.

You've got a real hard on for PM.

Again, you prove to be a complete fool as you still don't understand..... Stay in your mummy's basement and off of her computer whiteworm !

 

[Whitesnake1987]

Again, you prove to be a complete fool as you still don't understand..... Stay in your mummy's basement and off of her computer whiteworm !

Whatever you say douchbag