I want to set a few things straight:
1. Yes I did agree to the arrangement with the MPA prior to the start of the session. However, I did not want to argue with the MPA, because I did not want to appear stingy and ruin the session. I am not stingy, but I still enjoy a fair deal. I would still enjoy a fair deal even if I had billions of dollars in my bank account.
2. You all seem to imply that because the major MP's are offering this price structure, that it is ok and that you get what you pay for: ie, quality. That is simply not true. Do you reallize what you can do with $260? You can get laid with the hottest escort for about an hour. What do you get at an MP? YOu get a lot of "no you can't touch this" and a quick as hell hand release. I realize that it's not the same thing, and I don't even want/like escorts, but that's not the point. The point here is about value and $260 at an MP is not good value, even if it were 2 hours with 2 girls and a hot-tub. Well I'm exaggerating, but you get my point. I think that if the major MP's are trying to rip us off, we should voice our opinions and fight back. After all, they make a living off of us.
3. One of you had mentioned that because the girl is spending an hour with one guy, she is losing a potential half hour session with another guy, so therefore the charges are doubled to make up for that loss. But if she does do 2 half-hour bs sessions with two different guys therefore earning her full $260, does she not give 1 sog for each guy, thus equalling 2 sog? Does she not give 1 bs for each guy, therefore equalling 2 bs? She still gets $260, but puts out 2 sog's and 2 bs's. In the one hour session she still gets the $260 but only puts out 1 sog and 1 bs. Now say slowly with me: THAT IS A RIP-OFF. No I am not getting my money's worth. Like I said before, either lower the price to $160 for the 1 hour session, or offer more in the one hour so as to justify the $260.
It's simple people, it's not brain surgery. Simple economics, simple math. Think!
1. Yes I did agree to the arrangement with the MPA prior to the start of the session. However, I did not want to argue with the MPA, because I did not want to appear stingy and ruin the session. I am not stingy, but I still enjoy a fair deal. I would still enjoy a fair deal even if I had billions of dollars in my bank account.
2. You all seem to imply that because the major MP's are offering this price structure, that it is ok and that you get what you pay for: ie, quality. That is simply not true. Do you reallize what you can do with $260? You can get laid with the hottest escort for about an hour. What do you get at an MP? YOu get a lot of "no you can't touch this" and a quick as hell hand release. I realize that it's not the same thing, and I don't even want/like escorts, but that's not the point. The point here is about value and $260 at an MP is not good value, even if it were 2 hours with 2 girls and a hot-tub. Well I'm exaggerating, but you get my point. I think that if the major MP's are trying to rip us off, we should voice our opinions and fight back. After all, they make a living off of us.
3. One of you had mentioned that because the girl is spending an hour with one guy, she is losing a potential half hour session with another guy, so therefore the charges are doubled to make up for that loss. But if she does do 2 half-hour bs sessions with two different guys therefore earning her full $260, does she not give 1 sog for each guy, thus equalling 2 sog? Does she not give 1 bs for each guy, therefore equalling 2 bs? She still gets $260, but puts out 2 sog's and 2 bs's. In the one hour session she still gets the $260 but only puts out 1 sog and 1 bs. Now say slowly with me: THAT IS A RIP-OFF. No I am not getting my money's worth. Like I said before, either lower the price to $160 for the 1 hour session, or offer more in the one hour so as to justify the $260.
It's simple people, it's not brain surgery. Simple economics, simple math. Think!